Hetfield v. Willey
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Scott
There is a technical reason why the present decree must be reversed. The court directed the installments of the purchase money payable in one and two years .should be paid in one and two years after the first day of August next after the making of the contract, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum. That would seem to be evident error. The contract provides the deferred payments shall be made in one and two years “from this date,”—that is, the date of the contract, which the evidence shows was the 6th day of July, 1880. Should the contract be enforced at all, it must be done…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Raginsky v. LawlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Kukulski v. BoldaIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Hernreich v. LidbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
- Jacksonville Hotel Building Corp. v. Dunlap Hotel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Bates Machine Co. v. BatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.