Legal Opinion

Raginsky v. Lawler

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1924No. 16154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Appellees filed their bill against the administrator and the widow and children of Gamillo Marcucilli, the latter all being minors, for the specific performance of a contract, made before Marcucilli’s death, for the conveyance to appellees of real estate. A decree was entered as prayed in the bill, and Edward J. Lawler, the administrator and guardian of the children, has appealed.

The contract was made March 25, 1921, by which appellees in substance agreed to buy the property for the sum of $18,000, subject to leases expiring in April, May and September. They agreed to, and did, pay $500 in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. SegalIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Smith v. DuggerIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hetfield v. WilleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Smith v. Farmers' State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Peru Wheel Co. v. Union Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  4. Keystone Sheep Co. v. GrearWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Kukulski v. BoldaIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API