McCosh v. Myers
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 6, March T., 1904, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Adams Co., Jan. T., 1904, Nos. 1, 2 and 3, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Margaret McCosh v. Willis A. Myers. Appeals from justice of the peace. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appealed. jErrors assigned were various instructions, and that the charge was inadequate and unfair.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
All of the thirty-eight assignments of error relate to the charge. We have fully examined and considered all of them in the light of the evidence and the charge as a whole, and, *62notwithstanding the very earnest argument of appellant’s counsel, are unconvinced that there is any error in the charge for which the judgments or either of them should be reversed and the parties put to the expense of a retrial. We are wholly unable to agree with the appellant’s counsel that the charge was inadequate, partial or in any sense of the term one-sided. The court gave a general review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cauley v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Krepps v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Provident Life & Trust Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Taylor v. BurrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yost v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. PilnikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Heller v. BercawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916