Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pilnik

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1905No. 1; Appeal, No. 159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 159, Oct. T., 1905, by Barnet Pilnik, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 162 and Jan. T., 1905, No. 532, on plea of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Barnet Pilnik. Indictment for keeping a disorderly house. Error assigned was in sentencing the defendant to the penitentiary.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

On February 9, 1905, the defendant withdrew his pleas of not guilty to two indictments, one found at December Term, 1902, No. 162, and the other found at February Term 1905, No. 134, and pleaded guilty. On the following day the court sentenced the defendant upon both indictments to terms of imprisonment in the eastern penitentiary, the term of imprisonment in the second case to begin after the expiration of the term of the sentence in the first case. The indictments charged-separate and distinct offenses, and the judgments, although rendered at the same time, are likewise separate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cauley v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. McCosh v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Falls and SykesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API