Legal Opinion

Yost v. Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1954No. Appeals, Nos. 199 and 200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Weight, J.,

Eoumania O. Eiegel has appealed from the refusal of the lower court to grant a new trial after verdicts in favor of Laura M. Yost and Clarence M. Yost, husband and wife, in a trespass action against the City of Philadelphia, in which action appellant was joined as an additional defendant. Appellees moved to quash the appeal on the ground that the only judgment entered in their favor was against the City, as original defendant, whereas the appeal was taken by the additional defendant. Our decision on the merits makes it unnecessary to rule on this motion.

On November…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Brown v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Greene v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Fisher v. Pomeroy's, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Martin v. SoblotneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Ratay v. LiuSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. 222 Liberty Associates v. EESCO Electric, Inc. (In Re 222 Liberty Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API