City of Fairborn v. Orrick

Defendant-appellant Leslie Orrick appeals from his conviction and sentencing for driving under a suspension. Orrick argues that the police officer who checked his registration lacked the requisite articulable and reasonable suspicion to do so. We agree; therefore, Orrick’s conviction will be reversed. Since it is clear from the record that there was no other evidence to support the conviction, he will be ordered discharged.

I

The city of Fairborn has not filed a brief; therefore, in accordance with App. R. 18(C), we will accept Orrick’s statement of the facts and issues as correct.

Orrick was…