Legal Opinion

State v. Frye

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1985No. 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

The defendant, William Frye, was convicted for driving with a suspended license. His sole assignment of error is that the police officer who stopped him lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion to stop him. This court reverses the conviction.

An officer of the Rittman Police Department stopped Frye because one of Frye’s taillights was not working. The officer then ran a check of Frye’s operator’s license and registration pursuant to the routine practice of the Ritt-man Police Department. The check revealed that Frye was driving with a suspended license in violation of R.C. 4507.38. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. ChattonOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GuysingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. VenhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. KeathleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. VanscoderOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. City of Fairborn v. OrrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API