Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Sharpe

Akron Municipal Court

Decided January 31, 1986No. 86 CRB 00074PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneiderman, J.

Plaintiff filed a motion to suppress the weapon seized on January 4, 1986, and any testimony relative to that instrument. The motion included a memorandum on the facts and the law, and an evidentiary hearing was held on January 13, 1986. The parties declined the opportunity to present additional statements of the law.

For purposes of this motion the court finds the pertinent facts as follows:

During the early morning hours of January 4, 1986, Akron police officers Urdíales and Smith were on duty in a police cruiser when they observed an automobile failing to stop at five separate stop signs in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BevanOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. ChagarisOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. City of Fairborn v. OrrickOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API