Legal Opinion
In Re Calvo
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1927No. 2747PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Coleman, J.:
This is an original proceeding in prohibition to prevent the respondent, a justice of the peace, from proceeding to try the petitioner upon a complaint wherein he is charged with violating section 4, c. 201, Stats. 1925, in that he grazed more than 50 head of sheep within three miles of a certain spring owned by another. Section 4 of the act reads:
“Any person who, without the right so to do, shall on two or more separate days during any season, water more than fifty head of live stock at the watering place at which another shall have a subsisting right to water…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Omaechevarria v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Colvin Cattle Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Allen v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Steptoe Live Stock Co. v. GulleyNevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Ex Parte IratacableNevada Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.