Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Toys" R" US, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 20, 1997No. 1:95 CV 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon a Motion for Summary Judgment (Document # 18) filed by Defendant Toys “R” Us, Inc. (hereinafter Toys “R” Us). For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Ronald Coleman and Jaynee Harwell, both African-Americans, worked for Toys “R” Us, Inc. at its retad toy store in Euclid, Ohio. Toys “R” Us hired Mr. Coleman as a Storeroom Clerk in August 1986, and later promoted him to Department Head in April 1993. Ms. Harwell was hired as a Cashier in August 1989, and was…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Sain v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Dorothy Kovacevich v. Kent State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Ishman v. NATIONAL BIOLOGICAL CORP./ETA SYSTEMSDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Nasrallah v. Robert Half International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020