Legal Opinion
Columbus Mutual Life Insurance v. Ford
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error : Court of Appeals for Geauga county.
1Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding in error to reverse the judgment of the court of common pleas of this county, in favor of the defendant in error, Mabel May Ford, on a policy of life insurance issued by plaintiff in error on the life of Moses Ford, husband of the defendant in error. The facts in the case as shown on the trial are substantially as follows :
On the 23d day of June, 1910, C. F. McFadden, agent of the insurance company, went into the harvest field of Moses Ford and solicited him to *412purchase an insurance policy on his life, whereupon the said Moses Ford made application in regular form for a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Keim v. Home Mutual Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Thompson v. Travelers InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Taylor v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Baldwin v. Chouteau InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rector, Wardens, & Members of the Vestry of St. Bartholomew's Church v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- National Surety Co. v. BohnOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BenedictOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987