Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1877No. 119PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The facts in the case are fully set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

This was an action by Mrs. Martha J. Day against the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance. Company, incorporated by the State of New Jersey, to recover the amount of a policy of insurance issued to her upon the life of her husband, the late Dr. Richard H. B. Day, of- Washington, in which judgment -was rendered against the company for the amount insured, $5,000 and interest. Mrs. Day having died pendente Ute, her administrator was. substituted here in her stead.

The policy, dated the 16th of July, 1869,'was for life, and stipulated for the payment of the annual premium of $137.50 on or before twelve…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Colt v. . Phoenix Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Cooper v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1871
  5. American Horse Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. MilwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Thornell v. Missouri State Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Cox v. Royal TribeOregon Supreme Court · 1903

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API