Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Bohn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. 23249PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Upon this voluminous record, the result of a long trial, a number of grounds of error are urged in this cause, which will be discussed under various heads.

First. Accommodation Paper. — It is argued that the $30,000 note was never to be paid by the Beaudette & Graham Company; that Bohn was the party primarily liable on the note; and that therefore Bohn suffered no loss, within the meaning of the policy, by the bankruptcy of the Beaudette & Graham Company.

This question as to the extent of the liability of the Beaudette & Graham Company upon these notes was put squarely up to the jury in special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. v. LuzioOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Columbus Mutual Life Insurance v. FordOhio Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. English v. National Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Coletta v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Nellas v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. State ex rel. Hertz Corp. v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Western Southern Life Ins. Co. v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API