Legal Opinion

Shotkoski v. Prososki

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1985No. 83-841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The defendant, who has a contractual interest in and is in possession of the southeast quarter of Section 14, Township 16 North, Range 5 West of the 6th P.M., Nance County, Nebraska, has appealed an order of the district court which enjoined him from obstructing the flow of water through a drainageway across that property.

He assigns as error that the trial court incorrectly determined that the drainageway mentioned in fact existed and that the court failed to find that the statute of limitations barred the action. However, he failed to argue the statute of limitations issue either in his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nichol v. YocumNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Grint v. HartNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Barry v. WittmersehouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Cather & Sons Construction, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romshek v. OsantowskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Georgetowne Square v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Gruber v. County of DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. D & R Realty v. BenderNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API