Legal Opinion

Johnson v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 30, 1992No. 23604PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Johnson brought this action claiming his employer, J.P. Stevens & Co., terminated him in retaliation for filing a Workers’ Compensation Claim. The issue presented on appeal is whether under Rule 41(b) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure the master-in-equity is required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff in granting the defendant’s motion for dismissal at the end of the plaintiffs case. We hold the master is allowed to weigh the evidence at this point and affirm.

Johnson was hired by J.P. Stevens on August 5, 1988. At that time, Johnson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webb v. DAYTON TIRE & RUBBER CO. ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Wallace v. MILLIKEN & COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Wright v. Fiber Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Silvester v. Spring Valley Country ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Hinton v. Designer Ensembles, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Calvin Barton v. House of Raeford Farms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Estate of Livingston v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Atkinson v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API