Legal Opinion
Estate of Livingston v. Livingston
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 30, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2010-179986; No. 5078PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
In this cross-appeal, the parties dispute the master’s findings concerning farmland in North, South Carolina, devised in a will. Clyde Livingston argues the master erred in concluding (1) the United States Department of Agriculture (the USDA) benefits were estate property and (2) the statute of limitations did not bar Emma Livingston Martin’s claim to collect repayment of those benefits. Emma, both personally and on behalf of the estate, contends the master erred by (1) failing to apply the probate code, (2) applying section 15-61-25 of the South Carolina Code (2009), governing partition, (3)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Estate of ATN Burns Livingston ex rel. Estate of ATN Burns Livingston v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Fleming v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Livingston v. LivingstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.