Legal Opinion
Martin v. District of Columbia Courts
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 2000No. 98-CV-1415PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Reginald Martin petitioned the Superior Court to review the termination of his employment by the District of Columbia Courts (“D.C.Courts”). Martin alleged that his termination was unlawful and in violation of the D.C. Courts’ Comprehensive Personnel Policies (“CPP”) governing adverse actions against court employees. 1 The trial court dismissed Martin’s petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse. We hold that the Superior Court has jurisdiction to review adverse actions against nonjudicial court employees who have exhausted their…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mathis v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cornish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ronda Nunnally v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- District of Columbia Housing Authority v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Davis & Associates v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.