Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahdi

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2001No. 00-CO-1288PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

The United States brings this appeal from a grant of appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for Vindictive Prosecution, arising out of charges of possession of cocaine and simple assault. The trial court granted in part and denied in part appellee’s motion, dismissing the simple assault charge and allowing the possession of cocaine charge to go forward. The government appeals this ruling, alleging that the trial court erred in applying the law on prosecutorial vindictiveness. We agree that because the evidence established that there was no actual vindictiveness on the part of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Teoume-Lessane v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Neal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Simms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Magruder v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API