Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. General Motors Hourly-Rate Employee's Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided April 22, 2015No. 7:14-CV-00777 (MAD/TWD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se plaintiff, Gary Hamilton, commenced this action on June 26, 2014, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and equitable estoppel under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff later clarified that the true nature of his claim is one for improper denial of pension benefits. See Dkt. No. 18 at ¶¶ 8-9. Plaintiff originally filed his complaint against General Motors Corporation Hourly-Rate Employee’s Pension Plan (the “Plan”) and its Plan Administrator, Kevin Cobb. See…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cruz v. NaqviDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Cruz v. NaqviDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Cunningham v. LupisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Gawlik v. SempleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- McLaurin v. BowlesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022