Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Mallory

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 19, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Winnebago District Court. — Hon. Clifford P. Smith, Judge. Action at law to recover for services rendered at the instance of' the defendant. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.- —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The plaintiff claims that at defendant’s verbal request he went to Buffalo Center, Iowa, and there “trained four certain ponies and one goat,” devoting to said’ services a period of six weeks, and that his labors were reasonably worth $15 per week, no part of which has been paid. The defendant denies the claim thus stated, and avers that plaintiff undertook to train the animals without any compensation, except such as he “might realize from the use of said animals in the show business.” He also sets up a counterclaim against the plaintiff, for money lent, rent of house, and for hay and corn…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Groves v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. Miracle v. Barker Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Matheson v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Pittman v. LemasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API