Legal Opinion
Bailey v. DiMario
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 1995No. Civil Action 91-2074 (HHG)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
Findings of Fact
This action was commenced on August 16, 1991 by seventeen individual plaintiffs employed by the United States Government Printing Office (“GPO”). At the time the complaint was filed, the plaintiffs were all employed by GPO as Video Keyboard Operators in the Video Keyboard Section (“VKS”) of the Electronic Photocomposition Division (“EPD”).
At the time the complaint was filed, the original defendant, Robert W. Houk, was the Public Printer at GPO, the agency’s chief executive officer. At the time of trial, the present defendant, Michael F.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Fag Bearings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Budik v. AshleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Lindell v. Landis Corp. 401 (K) PlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Carter v. RubinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Atchison v. U.S. District CourtsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.