Legal Opinion

Morris v. Moller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2012No. 20110196PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Lance Morris appeals from a district court judgment awarding Ceisha Mol-*268ler primary residential responsibility of the parties’ two children. We conclude the court’s judgment was not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Morris and Moller were not married but lived together from the latter part of 2004 through February 2009. They had two children — C.M., a son, and J.M., a daughter — before separating. Moller also had a daughter, A.G., from a previous relationship; A.G. resided with the parties and their children. After the parties separated, Morris filed suit for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doll v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Doll v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hanson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sailer v. SailerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. S.H.B. v. T.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Dick v. ErmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Seay v. SeayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Mairs v. MairsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API