Morris v. Moller
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Lance Morris appeals from a district court judgment awarding Ceisha Mol-*268ler primary residential responsibility of the parties’ two children. We conclude the court’s judgment was not clearly erroneous, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Morris and Moller were not married but lived together from the latter part of 2004 through February 2009. They had two children — C.M., a son, and J.M., a daughter — before separating. Moller also had a daughter, A.G., from a previous relationship; A.G. resided with the parties and their children. After the parties separated, Morris filed suit for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doll v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Doll v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Hanson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Sailer v. SailerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- S.H.B. v. T.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Dick v. ErmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Seay v. SeayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Mairs v. MairsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.