Legal Opinion

Seay v. Seay

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2012No. 20110332PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Darren Seay appeals from a district court judgment granting a divorce to Svetlana Seay and awarding her primary residential responsibility of the parties’ two minor children, A.M.S. and N.A.S. We affirm in part and reverse in part, concluding: (1) the district court’s finding of fact awarding primary residential responsibility of A.M.S. to Svetlana Seay is not clearly erroneous; (2) the district court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered Darren Seay to maintain a life insurance policy on himself as security for his support obligations; and (3) the district court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hawkinson v. HawkinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hildebrand v. StolzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Interest of N.C.M., D.C.M., and J.J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Interest of S.R.L.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API