Legal Opinion

Doll v. Doll

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2011No. 20100133PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Andrew Doll appeals from a judgment awarding primary residential responsibility of the parties’ minor children to Sarah Doll, now known as Sarah Claeys, and order denying his motion to amend the judgment.1 We conclude the trial court did not clearly err in awarding primary residential responsibility to Claeys. Therefore, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Andrew Doll and Sarah Claeys married on June 22, 2002. A few months later, Claeys moved out of the marital home and filed for divorce. A default *428judgment granting the parties a divorce was entered on February 10, 2003. In the spring of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. DesLauriers v. DesLauriersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Molitor v. MolitorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Eifert v. EifertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dieterle v. DieterleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Morris v. MollerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Brouillet v. BrouilletNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API