Mengal Box Co. v. Moore
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM LAUDERDALE. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lauderdale County . — John S. Cooper, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes
This is an action of replevin for a number of saw logs. The chancellor decided in favor of the complainant; and the defendants have appealed.
*598The facts, so far as necessary to be stated, are that on the 3d of October, 1898, J. 0. Marley made a contract with J. H. Evans concerning the cottonwood timber on a tract of 2,358 acres of land in Lauderdale county. This contract, by a regular chain of conveyances or transfers finally vested in the defendants Moore & McFerrin. In March, 1903, before the expiration of the contract made by Marley with Evans, the Mengal Box Company bought of Marley the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Strasson v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Golden v. GlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Macomber v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. BoykinTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. Maryland Wrecking & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Lancaster v. RothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Indiana & Arkansas Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Hanna v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.