State Ex Rel. McWilliams v. Town of Oak Point
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BARROW, Justice.
The question presented by this quo war-ranto proceeding is whether an inhabitant of the territory sought to be annexed under the provisions of Article 974 1 must be a “registered voter” in order to vote in the type election prescribed by this statute. The trial court held that the inhabitant, if otherwise qualified, need not be registered, and since a majority of the inhabitants otherwise qualified to vote had not signed the petition favoring annexation, the annexation ordinance was held void. The court of civil appeals, although not directly addressing the pivotal question…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graham v. City of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. City of WaxahachieTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Universal City v. City of SelmaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Myers v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- City of West University Place v. State Ex Rel. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zaidi v. ShahCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Long Island Trust Co. v. DickerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- National Convenience Stores, Inc. v. T.T. Barge Cleaning Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Long Island Trust Company v. DickerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.