Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fiess v. State Farm Lloyds

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2006No. 04-1104Published

1DissentJustice Medina

This case comes to us on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit asking us to determine under what circumstances, if any, the “ensuing-loss” provision of the Homeowners Form B (HO-B) insurance policy1 provides coverage for mold contamination. In answering that question, the Court concludes that mold can never be an ensuing loss within the meaning of that provision. The Court reasons that the ensuing-loss provision is not an exception to the excluded perils it modifies but rather an assurance that covered losses remain covered even when they ensue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hudson Energy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Balandran v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Employers Casualty Company v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Lambros v. Standard Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API