Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Frausto
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided May 14, 1951No. 1429PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
97 F.Supp. 583 (1951)
GARCIA
v.
FRAUSTO et al.
No. 1429.
United States District Court E. D. Missouri, S. D.
May 14, 1951.
Oliver & Oliver, and Jack L. Oliver, all of Cape Girardeau, Mo., for plaintiff.
Elmer A. Strom, of Cape Girardeau, Mo., for defendants.
HULEN, District Judge.
In support of defendant's motion defendant William E. McBride challenges the constitutionality of Section 506.220, R.S. Mo.1949, providing for service on the Secretary of State and notice to defendants by mail in certain types of automobile damage claims where defendants are non-residents, and second that venue as to defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Steele v. DennisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1945
- Krueger v. HiderDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1943
- State v. SloanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Urso v. ScalesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCoy v. SilerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Archambeau v. EmersonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
- Falter v. Southwest Wheel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Burke v. GreerDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1953
- Johnson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.