Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Dennistoun

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1925No. 24,452PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 204 N.W. 958. A demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action was sustained and this appeal followed.

In substance the facts alleged are as follows: In the year 1918 the plaintiffs, their brother Willard C. and their mother Phebe M. Fuller, were the owners of a farm of 160 acres in Redwood county. The mother's interest consisted of a life estate and an undivided one-third of the land in fee, and the interest of each of the three sons of an undivided two-ninths in fee, subject to their mother's life estate. Between March 1, 1918,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Starkweather v. JennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Hoyt v. LightbodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Whitney v. SalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Oliver v. HedderlySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. McLawhorn v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RiiseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Dampier v. PolkMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Slagle v. SlagleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Franklin v. DragooIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API