Legal Opinion

Dampier v. Polk

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1952No. 38230PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

Appellees sued to confirm their asserted title to 180 acres of land and an undivided one-fourth interest in the minerals therein, and to cancel the claims thereto of Plato Dampier, Larna Dampier, Mollie Dampier, I. F. Dale, Lawrence Polk, adult residents of Jefferson Davis County, and H. W. Dippel and M. A. Bletsch, nonresidents, all of whom were named defendants to the original bill. The appellees asserted title to the property under and hy virtue of a purchase thereof at a foreclosure sale under a deed of trust executed hy Plato Dampier and his wife to the Federal Land Bank. No answers were…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Comans v. TapleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. TravisMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Stevens v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Wight v. Ingram-Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. MERCHANTS AND PLANTERS BK.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wilson v. S.L. Rey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Gault v. BrantonMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gavin v. HoseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lee v. LEEMississippi Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API