Legal Opinion

Starkweather v. Jenner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1910No. 114PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF Columbia. Ti-if. facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton

The appellant, George B. Starkweather, was the owner of a, parcel of unimproved land known as the Crescent Heights, in Washington, D. C., composed of two contiguous lots, one of seven and the other of three acres. In January, 1892, pursuant to a plan arranged between himself and certain persons associated with him, and styled herein the syndicate, he conveyed this tract to defendants Croissant and Johnson, as trustees, for the benefit of the persons who should contribute to the purchase price, as tenants in common, in the share and proportion in which they respectively contributed,' with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pewabic Mining Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Turner v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Rothwell v. DeweesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  5. Allen v. GilletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Lund v. HeinrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Corn v. First Texas Joint Stock Land Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Investment Registry, Ltd. v. Chicago & M. E. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API