Legal Opinion
Lunati v. Barrett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1939No. 7824PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The patent involved in the present infringement suit is for a lifting device for motor vehicles granted to Lunati September 1, 1925, and numbered 1,552,326. It has for its object the providing of a device whereby a vehicle may be elevated to permit ready access to its mechanism for the purpose of repairing, cleaning and lubricating, and is of the single column hydraulic type now commonly seen at repair garages and greasing stations.
The Lunati claims in suit are 3 and 4, printed in the margin.1 It was held below that the defendant did not infringe. There was no decision…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Slawson v. Grand Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- D'Arcy Spring Co. v. Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The A. H. Emery Company v. Marcan Products Corporation, Marshall Control Products Corp., Hugh A. Mills, Ronald R. Marshall, and David E. GoldingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Preformed Line Products Co. v. Fanner Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- Winslow Manufacturing Co. v. Peerless Gauge Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
- Simplex Paper Box Corp. v. Rosenthal Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Hooker Chemical Corp. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.