Legal Opinion

The Upper Deck Company v. Pixels.com, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 9, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00923Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, Case No. 24-cv-00923-BAS-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SEAL (ECF No. 114) 14 PIXELS.COM, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Upper Deck Company’s (“Upper Deck”) 18 renewed motion to seal. (ECF No. 114.) For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN 19 PART and DENIES IN PART Upper Deck’s motion in accordance with Appendix A. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Defendant Pixels.com (“Pixels”) allegedly interfered with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Electronic Arts, Inc. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API