Legal Opinion

Hoague-Sprague Corporation v. Frank C. Meyer Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 28, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff has sued defendant for alleged violation of plaintiff’s copyright, and in said suit now makes this motion for a preliminary injunction. The defendant, in addition to the opposing of this motion of plaintiff, moves to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that, as a matter of law, the alleged copyright of plaintiff is invalid.

At the outset there is another point for dismissal, made by the defendant, which should be mentioned. The complaint sets forth that the label in suit was designed for hire by a designer, and was thereupon published with a copyright notice. It…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. United States v. HealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoague-Sprague Corporation v. Frank C. Meyer Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  2. Bobrecker v. DenebeimDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1938
  3. Dixie Vortex Co. v. Lily-Tulip Cup Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1937
  4. William Faehndrich, Inc. v. Wheeler Riddle Cheese Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API