Legal Opinion
Dixie Vortex Co. v. Lily-Tulip Cup Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 26, 1937No. 7397PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This action relates to the alleged infringements of letters patent No. 1,766,420, issued to the Indiyidual Drinking Cup Company, Inc., of Pennsylvania, on the application of Wessman and Stone, for a paper cup making machine; of letters patent Nos. 1,256,913 and 1,336,469, both issued to the Individual Drinking Cup Company, Inc., of New York, on the applications of L. W. Luellen, for cup containers or dispensing apparatus;.of design patent No. 74,793 for a paper cup or similar article, issued to the Individual Drinking Cup Company, Inc., of Pennsylvania, on the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Jeweler's Circular Pub. Co. v. Keystone Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- J.M. Huber Corp. v. Lowery Wellheads, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Germanow v. Standard Unbreakable Watch Crystals, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- J.M. Huber Corporation v. Lowery Wellheads, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985