Legal Opinion

In re Baby Boy C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*36OPINION OF THE COURT

Gonzalez, J.

This is an adoption proceeding in which the Tohono O’odham Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe, seeks to intervene pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA; 25 USC § 1901 et seq.) upon the ground that this is a “child custody proceeding” involving an “Indian child,” as those terms are defined in ICWA. Family Court denied intervention under ICWA, . instead adopting the judicially created “existing Indian family” (EIF) exception, which avoids the application of ICWA in circumstances where the court determines that the child is not part of an…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. R.B. v. C.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Adoption of Kenten H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. In re N.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API