Fischer Imaging Corp. v. Lorad Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
*274MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PRINGLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Fischer Imaging Corporation’s Motion to Compel Answer to Interrogatory and Response to Request for Production. On May 15, 1992, an Order of Reference was entered referring this case to a Magistrate Judge for determination of all nondispositive motions. The parties have fully briefed the issues, and oral argument would not materially assist the Court is deciding the matters presented. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Fisher…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- Cleo Wrap Corp. v. Elsner Engineering Works, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Ideal Toy Corp. v. Tyco Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1979
- Davco Manufacturing Corp. v. Peninsular Diesel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Central Sprinkler Co. v. Grinnell Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cordis Corp. v. SciMed Life Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- ICU Medical, Inc. v. B.Braun Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- In Re Columbia University Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.