Legal Opinion
Frazier v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 7, 2007No. 07-636 CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, and cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed under Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). In this case, plaintiffs challenge a prospectus issued by the United States Department of the Interi- or’s Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) on June 7, 2007, for new concession contracts (new contracts) at Lake Berryessa, Napa County, California. Plaintiffs hold four of the seven current, expiring concession contracts at Lake…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gonzalez-McCaulley Investment Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Laguna Hermosa Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Norsat International [America], Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.