Legal Opinion
Norsat International [America], Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 16, 2013No. 13-41CPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bid Protest; Technical Evaluation; Deference; Agency Evaluation; Lack of Significant Prejudice
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
In this bid protest case, Norsat International [America] Inc., (“Norsat” or “the plaintiff’) challenges the United States Department of the Army’s (“the Army,” “the defendant,” or “the government”) decision to award a contract for the continued development and maintenance of the Defense Video and Imagery Distribution System (“DVIDS”) to Encompass Digital Media, Inc. (“Encompass” or “the defendant-intervenor”). Nor-sat argues that the Army arbitrarily and capriciously concluded…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- UnitedHealth Military & Veterans Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Am General, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Constellation West, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.