Legal Opinion
United States v. Ward
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 12, 1948No. 9530-9532PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Three defendants, Charles Hogan, Thomas B. Ward and Frank Cipullo, were indicted, tried and convicted of the substantive offense of defrauding the United States. 35 Stat. 1095 (1909), 40 Stat. 1015 (1918), 48 Stat. 996 (1934), 52 Stat. 197 (1938), 18 U.S.C.A. § 80. The three were tried together, although indicted separately and all three have appealed.
I. Charles Hogan.
This defendant’s case presents a feature not present in the others and may be summarily disposed of first. Since Hogan’s conviction, Anthony Martino, the only witness who gave substantial testimony…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McAffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Dennis Andrew NikraschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- United States v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- J. A. Herzog v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Edward A. Greer and Alphonse P. BartkusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- United States v. RaubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.