Legal Opinion

United States v. Dennis Andrew Nikrasch

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 5, 1966No. 15530_1PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Defendant was charged with transporting a stolen 1957 Chevrolet convertible from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to Skokie, Illinois, in violation of the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). Subsequently he filed a motion to suppress certain evidence seized without a search warrant. After the denial of the motion, defendant was found guilty on a bench trial and was sentenced to imprisonment. The only question raised on appeal is whether the District Court properly denied the motion to suppress evidence.

About 1:00 A.M. on December 12, 1964, defendant drove a 1957 Chevrolet convertible…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Anthony J. DichiarinteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Edward Mapp, A/K/A Sonny WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. Parrish v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Robert William Gorman v. United States of America, Edward Terrence Roche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API