Legal Opinion
Mullen v. Cogdell
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1994No. 57A05-9308-CV-289PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUCKER, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from three orders entered by the trial court during the pendency of a third-party complaint filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees Charles Cogdell and the law firm of Livingston, Dildine, Haynie & Yoder (collectively "Cogdell"). The complaint was filed against Defendants-Appellants John Mullen, Kathleen Mullen, and Robert Curran (collectively "Appellants") based on a claim arising out of a real estate transaction. Appellants moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion. Thereafter, Appellants filed a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Huber v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Anthem Ins. Companies v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.