Legal Opinion
Concerned Pastors for Action v. Khouri
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 7, 2016No. Case Number 16-10277PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States; District Judge
Three organizations advocating on behalf of the citizens of Flint, Michigan, and a Flint resident, have turned to the federal courts for relief from the hardship visited on the population caused by the mishandling of the City’s water treatment and distribution system. The targets of their lawsuit are the Michigan treasurer and members of the Flint Receivership Transition Advisory Board (RTAB) (the State defendants), and the City of Flint and its city administrator (the Flint defendants). Both…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boler v. EarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Concerned Pastors for Social Action v. KhouriDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Oakes v. WeaverDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Mich. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. City of FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Connie Norris v. Magnolia Water Utilities Operating Company, LLC, Magnolia Water Services Group, LLC, Magnolia Water Holding Company, LLC, Louisiana Central States Water, LLC, Central States Water Resources, Inc., Louisiana Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.