Reid v. Kerr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants sounding in equity. A trial was had by the court sitting without a jury; the court found the facts in accordance with the theory of the defendants and entered a judgment accordingly; from that judgment the plaintiff has appealed, bringing up the judgment-roll only.
The first point made by the appellant is that some of the findings are contradictory. In paragraph VI of the compláint the plaintiff alleged, “and said plaintiff did on the eighth day of February, 1921, make and execute to Edith Kerr a deed to the property described in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Davis v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Nakata v. Guarantee Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Ishii v. Guarantee Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Postin v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Laurel Crest, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Nelson v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.