Legal Opinion

Ishii v. Guarantee Mortgage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1922No. Civ. No. 4370PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County denying a motion for change of place of trial. O. E. Beaumont, Judge. Affirmed, The facts are identical with those stated in the opinion in Nakata y. Guarantee Mortgage Go., amte, p. 260.

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to change the place of trial. The pleading in form is identical with the pleadings discussed in the opinion this day filed in the case of Nakata v. Guarantee Mortgage Co., ante, p. 260 [212 Pac. 937]. The two cases were submitted on the same briefs.

For the reasons stated in the case cited the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Langdon, P. J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on January 25, 1923, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nakata v. Guarantee Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reid v. KerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API