Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hayman v. Autohaus on Edens, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 9, 2000No. 1-99-3539PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

Plaintiff Bruce Hayman (Hayman) rented a car. When the lease ended, he bought the car. Then he filed a class action suit for fraudulent misrepresentation, statutory consumer fraud, and conversion against Autohaus on Edens (Autohaus) and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (TMCC). The trial judge dismissed Hayman’s complaint. Hayman appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

On November 22, 1995, Hayman entered into a written agreement with Autohaus to lease a motor vehicle — a 1996 Toyota Camry — for a period of 36 months. The lease agreement stated in paragraph 10:

“Estimated Residual Value: The estimated value of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kerns v. EngelkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Miner v. Gillette Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wheatley v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Application of BusseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Kirkpatrick v. StrosbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Petty v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Akinyemi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Shoop v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API