Legal Opinion

Arnold v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1982No. 80-1077PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of one count of second-degree burglary, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-1801(b); attempted second-degree burglary and one count of destruction of property, D.C.Code 1973, § 22-403.

The record reflects that after the jury was impaneled but before they were sworn, the government filed enhanced penalty papers under D.C.Code 1973, § 22-104(a), since appellant had been convicted for four previous felonies. 1 In addition, the government filed an information indicating that appellant had committed two of the originally charged offenses while…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Prou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. Kevin WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Garry JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API