Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Peters
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1994No. 82357PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRETT, Vice Chief Judge:
Appellant sued Appellee for damages caused by an alleged breach of an oral contract. The trial court sustained Appellee’s motion and entered summary judgment for Appellee. Appellee performed hip replacement surgery on Appellant in 1980. After a fall in 1989, there was a revision of the previous surgery, which was performed by Appellee in 1990. Prior to the 1990 surgery, Appellant signed a consent form which, as applicable here, provided:
I am aware that the practice of medicine and surgery is not an exact science and acknowledge that no guarantees or warranties…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Erwin v. FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Karriman v. Orthopedic ClinicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Corbett v. Combined Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Loper v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc. v. U.S. Risk Underwriters, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Jackson v. LankfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Alvin Bates v. Dr. Joseph MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Rush v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Sanford v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001