Legal Opinion

Stovall v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1899PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Littlejohn. Dooly superior court. November 14, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

Besides the general ground that the verdict is contrary to law and without evidence to support it, the motion for new trial shows that exceptions were taken to the ruling of the court in refusing to continue the case, and in admitting in evidence a certain letter purporting to have been written by the accused before the homicide, and which was addressed to C. E. West, brothdr of the deceased; and because the court erred in failing to charge the jury the law applicable to involuntary manslaughter.

1. The motion for continuance was based on two grounds: 1st. That the accused had been confined in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gallery v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. McElhannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Herz v. Claflin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Favors v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. People v. . JernatowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Biegun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Armour & Co. v. Ross & BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API