Legal Opinion

Bellows v. Bellows

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for am injunction restraining the defendants from using a trade name.

1Opinion of the CourtStover, J.

This is an action to restrain the defendants from using the name of Charles Bellows in their business.

The complaint alleges that in the year 1847, one Charles Bellows, the father of the plaintiff, was established as dealer in wines and spirits, and for six years (until 1853) conducted the business under the name of Charles Bellows, and subsequently under the name of Charles Bellows & Oo. That about 1878 said Charles Bellows made an insolvent assignment for the benefit of creditors, and about the same year the firm of Charles Bellows & Oo. also *483made a general assignment for the benefit of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Helmbold v. Henry T. Helmbold Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Buffalo Oyster Co. v. NennoNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Cutter v. Gudebrod Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Burns v. NavorskaOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Julius Bien Co. v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API